Saturday, December 19, 2009

Defining The New Wth The Old

In today's game, former players complain about bad positioning and tackling on defense in football. My inclination is always to defend the "today's player" and see the view of the past player. In researching some of the former players, I noticed they played both offense and defense from little league to high school. They were starters and stars in college on both sides of the ball. My question is: did playing offense in college helped them become better defensive players in the pros? Today's players learn either offense or defense but never both with some exceptions.

NFL legends like Dick Butkus, Jack Pardee, Ray Nitschke, Chuck Bednarik, and Lee Roy Jordan were linebackers who played offense as well from elementary school till college. Pardee and Nitschke played fullback in college while Bednarik, Butkus, and Jordan played center. With the exception of Bednarik, these players became defensive specialists in the pros which gave them advantages concerning positioning, tendency situations, and movement. For instance, is the receiver, running back, or quarterback timid, injured, or could not move to a certain area? Likewise, each player broke down the offense and reacted to the situation, accordingly. In essence, they knew when and how to make the tackle before the snap of the ball.

Due to this knowledge and ability, most linebackers in that period called their own plays with the exception of Lee Roy Jordan. When he played for the Dallas Cowboys, his defensive coach, Ernie Stautner called the plays. Stautner studied opponents offenses and tendencies from the week leading up to the game by film. Likewise, he set up a computer program on what teams did in situations on certain downs whether they ran or passed the football. But in a playoff game against the 49ers, Lee Roy saw something in the backfield in what appeared to be a running play but decided it was a pass play and set up the defense over Stautner's objections. The result was an interception to win the game.

The media of the time said, it was natural instincts and Lee Roy himself didn't know why he made that assumption. A close examination reveals that Lee Roy studied film like his coach. Yet, it was his experience as a center in college that helped him looked for tendencies and the confidence to make decisions. Considering that eleven other guys are at the line of scrimmage, Lee Roy noticed how a 49er running back kept his hand down during runs and on pass plays, lifted his fingers slightly before the snap of the ball. Hence, the decision to call pass and the ensuing interception.

The question becomes whether today's specialists would make that play or be in position to make that play? Should we expect them to do so when they are specialized to play one part of the line? I defend today's players but understand the frustration of past players. The blame should go to those who put emphasis on player specialization instead of player development which starts in elementary school through college. If it wasn't for development, yesterday's players might as well be today's players.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

This is what Johnny Unitas said about football being too specialized. When he played at Louisville, he play linebacker, saftey, returned kicks, and punts. He said playing defense contributed to his play calling abilities on offense. He knew instinctively what they were going to run by how the linebacker or safety was reacting.